Legal Opinion · Dissent

Donkers v. Kovach

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2008No. Docket 270311Published

1DissentMarkey, J.

I respectfully dissent because the plain text of MCL 600.1432 and MCL 600.1434, read in harmony, requires a witness to raise his or her right hand to swear or affirm to tell the truth before testifying. I also find no constitutional impediment to applying the plain statutory language as written. Thus, the trial court did not commit a legal error in requiring plaintiff Donkers to raise her right hand to affirm to tell the truth on deposition. Finally, considering all the circumstances of this case, I conclude that the trial *375court did not abuse its discretion or commit plain error warranting…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API