Legal Opinion

Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 16, 1996No. 94-2003PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

516 U.S. 233 (1996)

LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. BORLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC.

v.

BORLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC.

No. 94-2003.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 8, 1996.

Decided January 16, 1996

Henry B. Gutman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Kerry L. Konrad, Jeffrey E. Ostrow, Arthur R. Miller, Neal D. Goldman, and Donald J. Rosenberg.

Gary L. Reback argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Michael Barclay, Susan A. Creighton, and Katherine L. Parks.[*]

2Per curiam

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is affirmed by an…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

4Cited by40 opinions

  1. Danjaq LLC v. Sony Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Latimer v. Roaring Toyz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Bateman v. Mnemonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Saenger Organization, Inc. v. Nationwide Insurance Licensing Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. T-Peg, Inc. v. Vermont Timber Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API