Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Rogers, Michael Stuart Fichman, Raymond Francis Gustke

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 9, 1983No. 81-5369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Rogers, Fichman, and Gustke were convicted in the district court of conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1976). We affirm the conviction of each appellant.

I

All three appellants argue that the district court erred in denying their motion to dismiss the indictment because of government overreaching in violation of their due process rights. The arrests and convictions in this case arose out of the same Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) operation upheld in United States v. Savage, 701 F.2d 863 (11th Cir.1983).…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Thomas C. TobiasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Eugene Littrell and Marc DaviCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Gary Anthony Gianni, Joseph Mike Giardina, Richard Loren Holland, James Robert HamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Batres-SantolinoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Fred Sullivan, Nick Panaccione, Lazarro Louis Martos, Antonio Nilo Maldonado, Severo Pascual Martinez, Orlando MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Eddie Lee PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Julio RolonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API