Bravo v. Radc Enters., Inc.

*921This employment case concerns a choice-of-law clause in an arbitration agreement. The trial court interpreted the clause to mean some but not all individual employment claims must be arbitrated. We conclude all of them must be arbitrated.

The facts are simple. RADC Enterprises, Inc. hired Mel R. Bravo to manage a store. The parties signed a two-page arbitration agreement covering "all disputes" arising from the employment relationship. On page two, near *922the end, the agreement added a one-sentence choice-of-law provision: "This Agreement shall be governed by and shall be interpreted in…