Legal Opinion

Wofford v. Ethyl Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1994No. 24109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

Ethyl Corporation (Employer) contends that the trial judge erred in ordering it to allow Lee Ann Shuler Wofford (Administrator) to enter its plant for the purpose of inspecting the site where William S. Wofford, Jr. (Decedent) was injured even though no civil action existed to which discovery was relevant. We disagree and affirm.

I. FACTS

Decedent sustained a fatal on-the-job injury at Employer’s plant. After Employer paid all benefits required by the South Carolina Worker’s Compensation Act, Administrator sought to determine whether a claim existed against a third-party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lubrin v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
  2. Ex Parte Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stokes v. 835 N. Washington Street, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Walker v. Daley Hotel Management Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1994
  3. Wilson v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line RailroadPortsmouth County Circuit Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API