Legal Opinion

Kastner v. Algase

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1924No. 18629PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellants, as plaintiffs, by this action sought recovery of $276 expended in attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in obtaining the dissolution of a temporary restraining order. From a judgment denying the relief sought, they have appealed.

It appears that, in an action then pending in Chelan county, respondent Algase sought and obtained a show cause order requiring the defendants in that action, among whom were appellants here, to appear on a certain day and show cause why an injunction pendente lite should not issue, restraining them from *363selling, offering for sale, disposing of, or in any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White Pine Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chin on v. Culinary Workers Etc. UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hecla Mining Co. v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API