Legal Opinion

Foster v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed on the ground that the notice of intention to commence the action was defective as to the statement of the time when the injuries were received, and that the form of denial contained in the answer did not exempt the plaintiff from the statutory obligation of proving the service of a proper notice. (Purdy v. City of New York, 193 N. Y. 521, 523; Carson v. Village of Dresden, 202 id. 414; Forsyth v. City of Oswego, 191 id. 441; Bannon v. City of New York, 150 App. Div. 314; Walker v. City of New York, Id. 280; Mack Paving Co. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Purdy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Bannon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weisman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Dempsey v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API