Legal Opinion
Ming v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 1970No. Civ. 37028PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALARCON, J. *
Procedural History
An indictment was filed against petitioner Harry Ming, and codefendants Wildenhus, Stout, Ryan, Layton and Brown, charging them in count I with possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530.5); in count II with conspiracy to sell marijuana (Pen. Code, § 182); and in count III with sale of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11531). Pursuant to motions to set aside the indictment under Penal Code section 995, count III of the indictment was dismissed as to petitioner Ming and codefendant Brown, but the motions were denied as to counts I and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. MardianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. NicholasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Merrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- People v. BraunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Morris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.