Legal Opinion

Schenectady Illuminating Co. v. Board of Supervisors

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1915Published

Application for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtBorst, J.

The Schenectady Illuminating Company, a transportation corporation, as relator, applies-for a writ of mandamus to compel the board of supervisors of Schenectady county to reconvene, reconsider their action taken upon a claim of the relator, and re-audit the same, they having theretofore rejected said claim on the ground that the same was not a legal charge against said county.

In July, 1914, the board of supervisors, through its committee on charities and the superintendent of the poor and keeper of the almshouse of Schenectady county, served upon the illuminating company a demand, in writing,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Smart v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API