Legal Opinion

Hemingway v. Torson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 27,969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff prosecutes this action to recover the amount due under a contract for driving piling, and to recover damages sustained by reason of the defendants refusing to permit the plaintiff to complete the performance of the contract. Judg*701ment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount due under the contract and for the damages sustained, totaling $18,315.73. The defendants appeal.

The contract on which the plaintiff seeks to recover read as follows :

‘'Contract for Installation of Piling.

Aug. 18, 1925.

“Torson Const. Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Frazier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Seymour v. Armstrong & KassebaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Rettiger v. DannellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Royer v. Western Silo Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. VeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API