Hemingway v. Torson
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The plaintiff prosecutes this action to recover the amount due under a contract for driving piling, and to recover damages sustained by reason of the defendants refusing to permit the plaintiff to complete the performance of the contract. Judg*701ment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount due under the contract and for the damages sustained, totaling $18,315.73. The defendants appeal.
The contract on which the plaintiff seeks to recover read as follows :
‘'Contract for Installation of Piling.
Aug. 18, 1925.
“Torson Const. Co.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barrett v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Frazier v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Seymour v. Armstrong & KassebaumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Rettiger v. DannellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Royer v. Western Silo Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sullivan v. VeraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932