Legal Opinion
Mills v. Martin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 1987No. 86-CA-649PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHEHARDY, Chief Judge.
This appeal arises from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, H.E. Mills, and against defendants, Julius P. Martin and Doris Moore Martin, d/b/a RM Body Repair and Frame Center, Inc., in an action for wrongful conversion of property. Defendants reconvened for storage charges and recognition of a lien under LSA-R.S. 32:521, et seq.
On appeal defendants assert the trial judge erred in his calculation of the storage *118fees and in condemning defendants to pay plaintiff the value of his car. Alternatively, defendants contend the trial judge erred in his calculation of the value of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Quealy v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Jackson v. BrumfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Star Amusement, Inc. v. StriniLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Earl v. CorleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Hibernia National Bank, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Joseph M. Rault, Jr., Third Party Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Lake Charles Nissan, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Mills v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987