Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sandefer v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided February 27, 2007No. 2005-KA-01333-COAPublished

1Dissent

¶ 44. I dissent from the majority opinion herein. I believe that Sandefer's second issue is meritorious and would therefore reverse and render the conviction of burglary. Sandefer states his second issue as:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN FAILING TO GRANT MR. SANDEFER'S MOTION FOR A DIRECTED VERDICT AND SUBSEQUENT

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL AND MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL BASED ON THE ABSENCE OF ANY PROOF THAT MR. SANDEFER WAS UNLAWFULLY IN DR. TAYLOR'S HOME.

FACTS

¶ 45. In 2003, Dr. Roma Taylor lived and worked in Orange Beach, Alabama. Taylor also owned a house in Lee…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BerryhillMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. BaymonMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Miss. Transp. Com'n v. Ronald Adams Cont.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ashley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Alford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API