Legal Opinion

Core-Vent Corporation v. Implant Innovations, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 20, 1995No. 94-1330PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The question is whether, after the parties had agreed on a settlement of a patent infringement case and stated in court that they agreed with the detailed settlement terms that had been read into the record and after the parties were unable to agree upon all the provisions of a judgment, the district court properly entered a judgment that, except in relatively minor aspects, was identical to the stated settlement agreement. The defendant contends that the parties had not agreed on the terms of the settlement judgment and that the district court therefore…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dionisio v. Dacanay and Reynaldo C. Dacanay, by His Father and Next Friend v. Saturnina Mendoza, Victor P. Mendoza, and Doe Insurance Co. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Tiernan v. DevoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Billy G. Asberry v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  4. Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. B. D. Click Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Silicon Image, Inc. v. Genesis Microchip, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  2. Hyde Park Union Church v. CurryDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. Massie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Inamed Corp. v. KuzmakDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  5. Hood v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API