Legal Opinion

Parrott v. Parrott

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PROM CLAIBORNE. From the Chancery Court at Tazewell, S. J. W. Lucky, Ch., presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtSneed, J.

On the 15th of May, 1860, Reuben Parrott, executed a deed of gift of a tract of land in the county of Claiborne, to his two sons, Ledford and Latney Parrott. This deed was placed in the hands of Henry Beach, who wrote it for the parties. This bill was filed in Chancery at Tazewell, on the 4th of December, 1865, to have said conveyance set aside- and annulled, and the alleged fraudulent registration thereof, declared void, and *683of no effect. To this bill, Ledford Parrott, Latney Par-rott, and Henry- Beach, are made parties defendant. The bill alleges, that the complainant is an old man,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Jackson C. O'dell, Iii, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. George Busby Ford, Inc. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  4. Walker v. Bales Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  5. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company v. Worldwide Property Hub, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API