Sanders v. Burnham
Supreme Court of Vermont
Tort to recover damages for the alleged alienation of the affections of the plaintiff’s husband. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the June Term, 1916, Orange County, Slanton, J., presiding. Verdict for plaintiff. Defendant excepted. The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the CourtMides, J.
This is action for an alleged alienation of the affection of the plaintiff’s husband, and comes to this Court upon exceptions numbered from one to twenty-three inclusive.
The first exception which we take up in the consideration of this case is defendant’s exception No. 2 which includes several exceptions more or less related to each other; but in this connection we confine ourselves to the disposition of that part of this exception which relates to the admissibility of the testimony of the plaintiff, wherein she was asked to state what her husband *482told her with relation to conduct between…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lander v. SeaverSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
- State v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1876
- Fratini v. CasliniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
- Townshend v. TownshendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- Wright v. McKeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pugsley v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Bradley v. BlandinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Lewis v. GagneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Enos v. Owens Slate Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Underwood v. CraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.