Holmes v. King
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Tuscola; Beach, J. Attachment proceedings by Lucy M. Holmes against Robert H. King. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is error to review a judgment entered in an attachment proceeding. The affidavit for attachment waa sworn to by the plaintiff’s attorney, and stated the name of the plaintiff as L. M. Holmes. This *446affidavit was sworn to on the 16th day of January, and filed on the 17th of January, 1908. The writ of attachment was issued on the 16th day of January, and was indorsed on the back, “Filed January 16, 1908.” So that from the filing it would appear that the affidavit could not have been attached to the writ. This writ ran in the name of L. H. Holmes as plaintiff. The return of the sheriff is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- King v. HarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Millard v. HaywardMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Sweet v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yale State Bank v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1913