Legal Opinion

McKean McNeal v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1922No. Nos. 2514, 2516. [fn*]Published

1Opinion

On Appellants’ Motion for Rehearing.

We think the conclusion reached that the trial court did not err when he overruled the plea of privilege was in conformity to law established in this state by cases cited in the opinion, but have concluded after further consideration that said court did not have a right to try the case on its merits pending the appeal from the judgment overruling said plea. We were wrong in assuming that the question as to the court’s right to try the case on the merits had been decided contrary to appellants’ contention in Halliday v. Crews (Tex. Civ. App.) 237 S. W. 600.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Halliday v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API