Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dodson v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 1999No. 5-98-0304WCPublished

1DissentJustice Rarick

Because I believe claimant’s choice of walking across the grass was not unreasonable, I must dissent. When claimant exited from her workplace, it was pouring down rain. She chose to cut across the grass to reach her car more quickly. Cutting across the grass is not unreasonable or unusual and, in fact, was acquiesced to by employer. Contrary to the majority’s reading of Hatfill, claimant was not doing anything bizarre such as jumping over a ditch in violation of safety warnings. See Hatfill, 202 Ill. App. 3d 547, 560 N.E.2d 369. The path claimant chose was customary, permitted and reasonable,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hatfill v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API