Legal Opinion
Sandoval v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 4, 2003No. A02A2018, A02A2019PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
Epifanio Carmona, Jose Sandoval, and Juan Sandoval were jointly charged, and tried for possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute in violation of OCGA § 16-13-30. The jury found Carmona not guilty. It found Jose Sandoval and Juan Sandoval guilty as charged, and their separate appeals are consolidated in this opinion.
In Case No. A02A2018, Jose Sandoval contends that the trial court erred in denying him a directed verdict of acquittal and denying him a mistrial. He also claims that the court erred in admitting the marijuana into evidence because the State failed to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Inglett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Cowards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Perez-Castillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Aguilera v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Bodiford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Patten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Hitchcock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.