Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Haynes

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1924No. 9038Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— In Ex parte Stanley, 25 Texas Crim. App. 374, the rule is thus stated:

“Where the papers upon which a warrant of extradition is issued are withheld by the executive, the warrant itself can only be looked to for the evidence that the essential conditions of its issuance have been complied with, and it is sufficient if it recites what the law requires.”

These recitals should embrace the substance of the documents upon which the governor of the asylum state determines that the alleged fugitive was charged in the demanding state with an extraditable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Ex Parte ReggelSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Sullivan v. India Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. East Alabama Railway Co. v. Doe Ex Dem. VisscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Hughes v. PflanzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API