Legal Opinion

Bellman v. Yarmark Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 9, 1965No. 65-7PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was the defendant in a mortgage foreclosure and the counter-plaintiff in an action to secure forfeiture of interest payments pursuant to section 697.05 (4), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. He defended in the trial court upon the ground that the mortgage was void for usury. The Counterclaim was dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. A final decree of fore*664closure was entered and this appeal followed. Two points on appeal were presented. The first is as follows:

“THAT WHERE IN A SUIT TO FORECLOSE MORTGAGE, THE MORTGAGOR AFFIRMATIVELY PLEADS THE DEFENSE OF USURY AND THE…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Augusta Corp. v. StrawnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Padron v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Joyner v. BernardSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Rountree v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. Sprigg v. Dix, Et VirSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanono v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Lage v. Pan American BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Lupoff v. HartogDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API