Legal Opinion
Alk Associates v. Multimodal App. Sys.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 6, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
276 N.J. Super. 310 (1994)
647 A.2d 1359
ALK ASSOCIATES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MULTIMODAL APPLIED SYSTEMS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, CARL VAN DYKE, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND INGRID BRANDLE, AN INDIVIDUAL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 19, 1994.
Decided October 6, 1994.
Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN,[1] DREIER and VILLANUEVA.
Robert G. Shepherd argued the cause for appellants (Mathews, Woodbridge & Collins, attorneys; Brooks R. Bruneau, on the brief).
Deborah A. Savarese, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kavanaugh v. QuigleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- State v. SteeleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- State v. RossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Payton v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- O'Neill v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- First Trust Nat. Assoc. v. MerolaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Pansini Custom Design Associates, LLC v. City of OceanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- CHARLES J. PARKINSON VS. DIAMOND CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. (L-1341-18, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.