People v. Austin
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward M. Horey, J.
Basically the instant case involves the rights of a drunk found asleep in his car.
On July 2, 1984 the Supreme Court of the United States decided the action of Berkemer v McCarty (468 US_, 104 S Ct 3138, 82 L ed 2d 317). There the court analogized the “usual traffic stop” to a “so-called ‘Terry’ stop”. (See, 468 US, at p_, 82 L ed 2d, at p 334, 104 S Ct, at p 3150.)
In making its holding the Supreme Court refused to adopt a rule that would require Miranda warnings to be given in every traffic stop.
The court pointedly refused to adopt either a rule that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Dymond, New York County Courts1993
- May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
- May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986