Legal Opinion

Fair v. Kenny

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion to vacate a warrant of attachment.

1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.

The defendant A. E. Hickman Company, Ltd., through its attorney, appears specially for *413the purpose of this motion and. moves to vacate a warrant of attachment issued against its individual property upon the following grounds: 1. That a complete copy of the complaint and of the order of publication was not served, and 2, that the service was not made by one of the persons designated in section 443 of the Code of Civil Procedure as authorized to make service without the state of New York. The motion is based, among other things, “ upon the summons and complaint, the warrant of attachment issued…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Korn v. . LipmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Kieley v. Central Complete Combustion Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Cohnfeld v. BlissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Cohnfeld v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Davidoff v. ChipornoiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rome Trust Co. v. CummingsNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Vilas v. VilasNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In re the Claim of KunzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Sexton v. BernheimerNew York Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API