Legal Opinion

Fruits v. Pearson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1900No. 3,093PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

—The complaint in this cause avers, in substance, that on the 29th day of September, 1897, the defendant, appellee here, was the owner and in possession of a livery stock, and that the plaintiff was the owner of two lots in the town of Veedersburgh, Indiana, on which there was a mortgage amounting to $400; and that on said day the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an oral agreement for the sale and purchase of said stock, to wit: The said Fruits agreed to convey said real estate to Pearson clear of encumbrances, except the said mortgage, the amount of which he agreed to reduce to $296,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Gwynne v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Dantzeiser v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Gilbreth v. GrewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Harris v. BradleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quality Clothes Shop v. KeeneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Mohler v. Guest Piano Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Pfafflin v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Hawkins v. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API