Legal Opinion

Schulze v. Rasmussen

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2020No. A-19-901Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) SCHULZE V. RASMUSSEN NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). AMY SCHULZE AND PAUL FLEUREN, APPELLANTS, V. MATT RASMUSSEN ET AL., APPELLEES. Filed August 25, 2020. No. A-19-901. Appeal from the District Court for Washington County: JOHN E. SAMSON, Judge. Affirmed. Amy Schulze, pro se. Paul Fleuren, pro se. Clarence E. Mock, of Johnson & Mock, P.C., L.L.O., for appellees Matt Rasmussen and Bear…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Friedman v. FriedmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. U.S. Pipeline v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Gibbons Ranches v. BaileyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Clarke v. First Nat. Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In re Estate of RadfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API