Legal Opinion

B&R Textile Corp. v. Paul Rothman Industries, Ltd.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided August 16, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herman Cahn, J.

The gravamen of this motion to set aside the judgment is whether this court, which tried the above-captioned matter *99without a jury, applied the proper measure of damages in determining that defendant is liable to the plaintiff in the amount of 12VS cents per yard for the rejected merchandise (or $4,584.50) with interest from June 15, 1977.

Plaintiff originally brought this action to recover damages sustained when defendant failed to accept approximately 36,-000 yards of fabric out of a total shipment of 74,007 yards. Both the plaintiff and defendant deal in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pollen v. . Le RoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Dehahn v. InnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  3. Acuri v. FigliolliNassau County District Court · 1977
  4. Derami, Inc. v. John B. Cabot, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Portal Gallaries, Inc. v. Tomar Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Sumitomo Forestry Co., Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Holborn Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Peace River Seed Co-Operative, Ltd. v. Proseeds Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Stalloy Metals, Inc. v. Kennametal, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API