Legal Opinion

Dallas Power & Light Co. v. Loomis

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 1, 1984No. 05-83-00559-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOREY, Justice.

Dallas Power and Light Company sued Richard F. Loomis seeking to subject his homestead to satisfaction of a judgment. Loomis’ homestead was designated in 1954 at a time when, as found by the trial court, its value exclusive of improvements was “$10,000 or less but more than $5,000” and the constitutional exemption was $5,000. TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 51 (1876, amended 1970). D.P. & L.’s judgment was obtained in 1981 at a time when the constitutional exemption was $10,000. TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 51 (1973, amended 1983). D.P. & L. has appealed the trial court judgment denying…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. George Wilder & Co. v. McConnellTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Steenland v. Texas Commerce Bank National Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
  3. Hoffman v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Linch v. BroadTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Love v. HoffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re BarnhartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
  2. Jay v. Nesco Acceptance Corp. (In Re Jay)District Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
  3. Neso Acceptance Corp. v. Jay (In Re Jay)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Neso Acceptance Corp. v. Jay (In Re Jay)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. Rose v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API