Dallas Power & Light Co. v. Loomis
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
STOREY, Justice.
Dallas Power and Light Company sued Richard F. Loomis seeking to subject his homestead to satisfaction of a judgment. Loomis’ homestead was designated in 1954 at a time when, as found by the trial court, its value exclusive of improvements was “$10,000 or less but more than $5,000” and the constitutional exemption was $5,000. TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 51 (1876, amended 1970). D.P. & L.’s judgment was obtained in 1981 at a time when the constitutional exemption was $10,000. TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 51 (1973, amended 1983). D.P. & L. has appealed the trial court judgment denying…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- George Wilder & Co. v. McConnellTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Steenland v. Texas Commerce Bank National Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
- Hoffman v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Linch v. BroadTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Love v. HoffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re BarnhartUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
- Jay v. Nesco Acceptance Corp. (In Re Jay)District Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- Neso Acceptance Corp. v. Jay (In Re Jay)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Neso Acceptance Corp. v. Jay (In Re Jay)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Rose v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989