Legal Opinion

Britt v. Thorsen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1971PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants are the respective owners of two pieces of real property. Defendants’ property lies between plaintiffs’ property and the Pacific Ocean. Plaintiffs brought a suit against defendants, asserting a right-of-way across defendants’ property to the ocean. Defendants denied the allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint and requested affirmative relief by way of an injunction.

Immediately prior to the date set for the trial of the case, plaintiff Wayne Britt sought out defendants Lawrence Gardner and Arne Thorsen to see if the case could be settled without trial. The three men had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. General Realty Corp. v. Douglas Lowell, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Bend Millwork Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Rose City Transit Co. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API