Legal Opinion
Nierzwick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 19, 2001No. 00-1575PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Bruce E. Nierzwick appeals pro se from a district court judgment that affirmed the Commissioner’s decision to terminate his social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). .
An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Nierzwick had previously been found to be disabled as of September 23, 1987, and that he still had a severe impairment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Charlene M. CUTLIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Clarence WALTERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Yer Her v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ray MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jones v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Kennedy v. Comm Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Bhamidipati v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Boone v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Bowden v. Commissioner for Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.