Legal Opinion

Gould v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 21, 1996No. 95-2138PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s convictions for delivery of cocaine, possession of cocaine and use of a minor in the sale or delivery of cocaine are affirmed. We find the evidence was sufficient to submit the case to the jury. As to the improprieties in the prosecutor’s closing argument, although aspects of the closing were marginal and objections were made, the lower court’s failure to sustain the objections made does not amount to reversible error. The state properly concedes an error was made in the written sentence imposing probation. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for correction of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Forget v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Beaudry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API