Legal Opinion

Getz Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 22, 1965No. Reap. Dec. 11106; Entry No. 2141-D, etcPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

In this case, 46 reappraisement appeals were consolidated for trial. The appeals challenge the appraised value of certain Japanese plywood, exported from various Japanese ports during the years 1951, 1958, 1959, 1960, and 1961. By stipulation of the parties, the merchandise involved in the various imports is limited to plywood of the lauan or the sen species in a blend of 50 per centum first quality and 50 per centum second quality in doorskin sizes, (4 inch *694and 4 by 7 or 8 feet, and % inch and 4 by 7 or 8 feet. It was further agreed that where the term “Philippine mahogany”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. National Carloading Corp.United States Customs Court · 1961
  2. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Rico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Rodriguez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  5. International Packers, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Getz Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Plywood & Door Northern Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. United States v. Getz Bros.United States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API