Legal Opinion · Concurrence

O'Brien v. Barretta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2003Published

1Concurrence

Goldstein, J.,

concurs in the result, with the following.memorandum: I agree that the liability verdict should not be disturbed and there must be a new trial on damages based upon the trial court’s conduct during the cross-examination of the defendants’ medical expert.

However, in my view the trial court properly denied a missing witness instruction with respect to the surgeon Dr. Frank J. Cammisa, Jr., on the ground that his testimony would have been cumulative. Further, since the defendants were fully aware of the plaintiffs claim for future lost earnings which flowed immediately and directly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chandler v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Reed v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Kane v. LinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Jellema v. 66 West 84th Street Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Rojas v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API