Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (Lines East)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 6, 1967No. 20348, 20349Published

1DissentJ. Skelly Wright, Circuit Judge

Public Law 88-108 1 provides that the compulsory arbitration required in this case “shall be conducted pursuant to sections 7 and 8 of the Railway Labor Act.” Pub.L. 88-108, § 4. As I have indicated in my dissents in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co., 127 U.S.App.D.C. -, 380 F.2d 603 (1967), and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RR Co., 127 U.S. App.D.C. -, 380 F.2d 605 (1967), the Compulsory Arbitration Board convened pursuant to Public Law 88-108 cannot avoid this statutory requirement by delegating portions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (Lines East)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API