Legal Opinion

State v. Jacob

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 2006No. 0202-31253, A119971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*64EDMONDS, J.

The state appeals after the trial court refused to impose a 30-year gun minimum sentence pursuant to ORS 161.610(4)(c) (2001), amended by Or Laws 2005, ch 407, § 1. For the reasons that follow, we remand for resentencing.

The facts that frame the issue on appeal are as follows. In late 1982, defendant was convicted by a jury of robbery in the first degree. In early 1983, pursuant to the applicable version of ORS 161.610, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing without a jury and found that defendant had used or threatened to use a firearm in the commission of the crime for which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. ProbstOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JacobOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. JacobCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API