Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Boulware

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Barton Circuit Court. — Hon. D. P. Stratton, J udge. (1) Respondent's suggestion is that appellant ought not to be allowed for printing the abstract because it was not an abstract of the entire record. As it was it contained 224 pages. The testimony of some sixty witnesses was very much abbreviated. Enough appeared to warrant this court in reversing the judgment and remanding the cause.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Barton Circuit Court. — Hon. D. P. Stratton, J udge. (1) Respondent's suggestion is that appellant ought not to be allowed for printing the abstract because it was not an abstract of the entire record. As it was it contained 224 pages. The testimony of some sixty witnesses was very much abbreviated. Enough appeared to warrant this court in reversing the judgment and remanding the cause. (2) The law relative to fees for the stenographer’s transcript is a fixed fee of “ten cents per folio of one hundred words,” and in all cases of appeal it is made the duty of the stenographer,…

1Opinion of the CourtGill, J.

At the March term, 1898, an opinion in this case was handed down reversing the judgment and remanding the cause. At that term respondent filed motion for rehearing and at the same time made an offer to remit the damages awarded on one count of the petition. During the said March term also the appellant filed his motion asking an allowance for the cost of printing the abstract. Both these motions went over to the October term, 1898. When plaintiff’s offer to remit was accepted and the former order was so modified as to enter a judgment here for the plaintiff on the other three counts of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shed v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. In re GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis & Gulf Railway Co. v. Cape Girardeau & Thebes Bridge Terminal Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. United Verde Extension Mining Co. v. BilesArizona Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API