Legal Opinion

Carson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1936No. 18273Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant moves for rehearing. He earnestly contends that the second count in the indictment, which alone was submitted to the jury, is duplicitous and repugnant. We are not able to agree with him.

As substantially said in our original opinion, appellant was charged with operating his car upon a public highway in Mc-Culloch County, to-wit: on what is known as North Bridge Street in the town of Brady, McCulloch County, Texas. We fail to see any repugnance or duplicity. Both averments as to the place of operation of appellant’s car relate to the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pool v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Akin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Buck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API