Legal Opinion

Lumpkin v. Muncey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1886No. Case No. 5875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Runnels. Tried below before the Hon. Wm. Kennedy. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

The question for decision in this case is: Was the registration in Bexar county, February 17, 1858, of the deed from de Cordova to Santees for the land in controversy, notice to the subsequent purchasers of the land under the sale made by DeCordova’s administrator? The boundaries of Runnels county were defined by an act of our legislature of February 1, 1858, and provision was made for its organization, but the organization did not actually take place till February 12, 1880.

It was attached for judicial purposes to Brown county by act of February 14, 1860. The land in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard v. ColquhounTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. O'Shea v. TwohigTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Frizzell v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  4. McKissick v. ColquhounTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Melton v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. LeCroy v. HanlonTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Leonard v. Benfford Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Trimble v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Harris v. Monroe Cattle Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Buse v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API