Legal Opinion · Dissent

Watson v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1940No. 28098, 28099Published

1DissentEelton, J.

I am of the opinion that the petition set forth a cause of action against the executor and his bondsman. While it is true that as a general rule the estate of a decedent is not liable for tortious acts committed by an administrator or executor in the course of the administration of the estate, the very statement that the principle is true as a general rule implies that there are exceptions. One exception is that the estate is liable if the representative commits a tort in the performance of an act authorized by law, Avhich results in benefit to the estate. Miller v. Smythe, 92 Ga. 154 (18 S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Miller v. SmytheSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Carr v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API