Banco Popular de Economias y Prestamos de San Juan v. Wilcox
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Judge,
delivered the following opinion:
The motion is made to dissolve the attachment proceedings on the ground that a fund in court is not subject to attachment, and in support of this proposition are cited the following cases: The Lottawanna (Wilson v. Bell), 20 Wall. 201, 22 L. ed. 259; Covell v. Heyman, 111 U. S. 176, 28 L. ed. 390, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 355; Jones v. Merchants Nat. Bank, 35 L.R.A. 698, 22 C. C. A. 483, 33 U. S. App. 703, 76 Fed. 683; United States v. Eisenbeis, 88 Fed. 4; Corbitt v. Farmers’ Bank, 114 Fed. 602; D. B. Martin Co. v. Shannonhouse, 203 Fed. 517; Tuckv.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Curtis v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Tuck v. ManningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Jones v. Merchants Nat. Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.