Legal Opinion

Rainier Brewing Co. v. Great Northern Pac. S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1921No. 3520Published

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Edward E. Cushman, Judge. # . . # . Action by the Great Northern Pacific Steamship Company against the Rainier Brewing Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

This is the second appeal, and in reality presents nothing new for our consideration. The facts are stipulated, and are, in brief, as follows:

In May, 1917, the brewing company delivered to the steamship company, at San Francisco, two carloads of beer for transportation to Seattle, to be delivered to the American Transfer Company, the consignee named in the bills of lading. The freight charges werb prepaid, on the basis of carload rates, in the sum of $425.57.

The shipments consisted of numerous packages of bottled beer, each bearing a permit, and marked in such manner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Great Northern Pac. S. S. Co. v. Rainier Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API