Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Colvin

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 30, 2015No. C.A. No. 13-01246-LPSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

STARK, District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Fyresta Tucker (“Tucker” or “Plaintiff’) appeals from a decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration *598(“Commissioner” , or “Defendant”), denying her claim, for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

Presently pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff and the Commissioner, (D.I. 9; D.I. 12) Plaintiff seeks, an: award' of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. August v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
  2. Bratnichenko v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  3. DUFFY v. BERRYHILLDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API