Holloman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Chief Judge.
Daniel Holloman was convicted in probate court of DUI, and he appealed to the superior court pursuant to OCGA § 40-13-28. The superior court affirmed, finding that since there was no transcript of the proceedings in probate court, it must presume the probate court’s judgment was correct. Upon Holloman’s appeal to this court, we remanded to the superior court with direction that the superior court issue an order to obtain any transcript or certified record from the probate court as was necessary to accord appellant the review to which he was entitled. See Holloman v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- North v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lattarulo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Walton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Day v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992