Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Quick

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 24, 1930No. 12906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action for the partition of a tract of land containing 135 acres alleged to have belonged to one Evander Wallace, Sr., and inherited by the plaintiffs and all of the defendants except Norman Quick, who claims the entire interest in the land. The case is quite complicated.

It appears essential to an apprehension of the various points that have arisen that a statement of the family relations of the Wallaces be given at the outset:

All of the parties, including the defendant Norman Quick, claim through a common source of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCall's Adm'r v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  2. Blackwell v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Ex Parte American Fertilizing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Griggs v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wellman v. TomblinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Hipps v. HippsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Pacific Mills v. Textile Workers' Union of America, Local No. 254Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  4. Wellman v. TomblinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API