Legal Opinion

Peterborough Savings Bank v. King

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 7, 1961No. 4906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The single question before us is whether the plaintiff savings banks, making loans on the credit of two-name paper which satisfy the legal requirements of RSA 387:5 IV (supp), may also take as additional security non-legal collateral without invalidating the loan. The issue is one of statutory interpretation of RSA 387:2 and 5 IV (supp), which in establishing the standards for making loans in the above category provide in part as follows: “2. Requirements. Savings banks . . . shall make investment . . . of their funds only in the . . . loans authorized by this chapter . . . . ” “5. Collateral…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Medford Trust Co. v. McKnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Appeal of Concerned Corporators of the Portsmouth Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Menge v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Ahrendt v. Granite BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. Kalloch v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. Simon v. New Hampshire Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API