Kirk v. Walter E. Deuchler Associates, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD
delivered the opinion of the court:
Whether a recipient of workers’ compensation benefits, who subsequently recovers a judgment from a third party, must account for accrued interest on the portion of the judgment recovered representing workers’ compensation benefits from the date of the judgment to the employer or his workers’ compensation insurance carrier is the question before us. The trial court ruled that the employee must pay back only the amount of the workers’ compensation payment made to him without interest, and the employer and his carrier (the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Becker v. Huss Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Pinkstaff v. Pennsylvania RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Willis v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Tracey v. ShanleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Kirk v. Walter E. Deuchler Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Compensation Fund v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Lakin v. Daniel Marr & Son Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Carter v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Shelby v. Sun Express, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Overlin v. Windmere Cove Partners, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.