Legal Opinion

Matter of Davis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 18, 1996No. 24391PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, respondent conditionally admits the allegations of the complaint filed against her and consents to a public reprimand. We accept respondent’s conditional admission and publicly reprimand her.

Juanita C. Davoll Matter

Ms. Davoll hired respondent in November 1992 to probate her father’s estate. From 1993 until 1995, Ms. Davoll made numerous attempts to contact respondent. In addition, Ms. Davoll wrote the probate judge expressing concern over respondent’s lack of diligence and requesting an inquiry into respondent’s ethics and professional abilities. After Ms.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. In re DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. In re DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API