Consolidated City of Jacksonville v. Dusenberry
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
At issue here is the validity of Section 804.311 of the Jacksonville City Ordinance Code requiring a $1,000.00 occupational license fee for fortune tellers, clairvoyants, astrologists, etc. The trial court found that the ordinance, asserted by the city to be solely a revenue raising device, was *133. . unreasonable and thus illegal and void . . We agree that the ordinance is not valid as a revenue raising device and affirm the trial court’s judgment. We do not in this opinion consider the power of the city to control this type of activity through regulatory ordinances.
AFFIRMED.
SMITH, Acting C.…
2Cited by1 opinion
- City of North Miami v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989