Legal Opinion

Consolidated City of Jacksonville v. Dusenberry

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 1978No. JJ-28PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

At issue here is the validity of Section 804.311 of the Jacksonville City Ordinance Code requiring a $1,000.00 occupational license fee for fortune tellers, clairvoyants, astrologists, etc. The trial court found that the ordinance, asserted by the city to be solely a revenue raising device, was *133. . unreasonable and thus illegal and void . . We agree that the ordinance is not valid as a revenue raising device and affirm the trial court’s judgment. We do not in this opinion consider the power of the city to control this type of activity through regulatory ordinances.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of North Miami v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API