Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Supnick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1921No. 10297PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from County Court, Tulsa County; W. B. Williams, Judge. Action by H. E. Supnick against J. L. Kennedy to recover damages. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER J.

This action was commenced In the county court of Tulsa county by H. E. Supnick, as plaintiff, against J. L. Kennedy, defendant, to recover damages to a stock of goods' belonging to the plaintiff, and which goods were in a building belonging to the defendant. The damage was occasioned by reason of the roof being in such a defective condition that when it rained the water percolated through and injured the stock of goods. The case .was tried to a jury, which resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $500, to reverse which the defendant, Kennedy, perfected this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. UrlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SmailesIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ramsay v. GottscheWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Price v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Staples v. BatySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Hoover v. WukaschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API