Lundgreen v. Stratton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Washburn County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoh, J.
The facts of this case, as established by the. evidence, the report of the referee, and by the admissions of the complaint, are substantially as follows:
Block No. 3, in the village of Spooner, Washburn county, is bounded on the north by Walnut street, and on the west by River street. Lot No. 12 is in the northwest corner of said block, and lot No. 11 adjoins it on the east. In Nor vember, 1883, River street on the west had not been opened, and it was not known by the defendants Stratton and Thomas just where lot 12 lay, but it was supposed that said lot was where it was afterwards discovered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Messer v. OestreichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- McMillan v. WehleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Meade v. GilfoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Whitney v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Tobey v. SecorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Elofrson v. LindsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Mills v. McLanahanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Dewey v. Spring Valley Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Fischer v. LaackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Lake Geneva Beach Asso. v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.